<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
	<title>ImmRef</title>
	<link>http://immref.com</link>
	<description>Monitoring the propaganda from supporters of massive immigration.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>

		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama dissembles on 14th amendment (anchor babies)</title>
		<link>http://immref.com/2008/01/13/barack-obama-dissembles-on-14th-amendment-anchor-babies/</link>
		<comments>http://immref.com/2008/01/13/barack-obama-dissembles-on-14th-amendment-anchor-babies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ImmRef</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://immref.com/2008/01/13/barack-obama-dissembles-on-14th-amendment-anchor-babies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Las Vegas Review-Journal "reporter" Molly Ball offers "no woman is illegal" with "Obama rocks Vegas faithful/Candidate charms voters at union hall, school gym". In one of his statements, Barack Obama appears to have dissembled about the U.S. Constitution:
	Obama took questions from the audience for more than half an hour. One person wanted to know what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://immref.com/2008/01/13/barack-obama-dissembles-on-14th-amendment-anchor-babies/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>PPIC study: immigration helps native-born workers</title>
		<link>http://immref.com/2007/02/28/ppic-study-immigration-helps-native-born-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://immref.com/2007/02/28/ppic-study-immigration-helps-native-born-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ImmRef</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://immref.com/2007/02/28/ppic-study-immigration-helps-native-born-workers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	The Public Policy Institute of California recently released a study [1] claiming that immigration has raised wages for native-born workers (even if it might lower wages for previous immigrants). Put in context, this study - or at least the reaction to it - appears to be an attempt by some to push for "comprehensive immigration [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://immref.com/2007/02/28/ppic-study-immigration-helps-native-born-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is "earned legalization" amnesty?</title>
		<link>http://immref.com/2007/02/11/is-earned-legalization-amnesty/</link>
		<comments>http://immref.com/2007/02/11/is-earned-legalization-amnesty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ImmRef</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://immref.com/2007/02/11/is-earned-legalization-amnesty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Yes, "earned legalization", a "path to citizenship", and all the other euphemisms are indeed an amnesty for illegal aliens. What they're called doesn't matter; what matters is how they're perceived by potential illegal aliens. Details in the page about the names for illegal alien amnesty.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://immref.com/2007/02/11/is-earned-legalization-amnesty/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten Ways The Bush Administration Promotes Illegal Immigration</title>
		<link>http://immref.com/2007/01/03/ten-ways-bush-promotes-illegal-immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://immref.com/2007/01/03/ten-ways-bush-promotes-illegal-immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ImmRef</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://immref.com/2007/01/03/ten-ways-bush-promotes-illegal-immigration/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are just ten of the ways. Many more to follow.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://immref.com/2007/01/03/ten-ways-bush-promotes-illegal-immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The WaPo and "hard-liners"</title>
		<link>http://immref.com/2006/08/20/the-wapo-and-hard-liners/</link>
		<comments>http://immref.com/2006/08/20/the-wapo-and-hard-liners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ImmRef</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://immref.com/2006/08/20/the-wapo-and-hard-liners/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Memo to the WaPo: a massive amnesty for 10+ million illegal aliens and 60 million legal immigrants in the next 20 years is not "moderate".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://immref.com/2006/08/20/the-wapo-and-hard-liners/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safe, legal and orderly comprehensive reform</title>
		<link>http://immref.com/2006/08/14/safe-legal-and-orderly-comprehensive-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://immref.com/2006/08/14/safe-legal-and-orderly-comprehensive-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ImmRef</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://immref.com/2006/08/14/safe-legal-and-orderly-comprehensive-reform/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Illegal immigration supporters seem to all be reading from the same script:
	
"regulates the movement of people across our borders in a manner which is legal, safe and orderly" (Vicente Fox)
	"President Fox, what are the concrete measures that Mexico is implementing to guarantee this indispensable security so as to have a legal, safe, and orderly migration?" [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://immref.com/2006/08/14/safe-legal-and-orderly-comprehensive-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>"Immigrant Rights" and the Washington Post's spin</title>
		<link>http://immref.com/2006/07/28/immigrant-rights-and-the-washington-posts-spin/</link>
		<comments>http://immref.com/2006/07/28/immigrant-rights-and-the-washington-posts-spin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ImmRef</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://immref.com/2006/07/28/immigrant-rights-and-the-washington-posts-spin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	The Washington Post and other sources frequently use the term "immigrants rights" when they're in fact refering to the rights of either illegal aliens together with legal immigrants, or simply illegal aliens. This abuse of the language goes hand in hand with, for instance, refering to those who want to enforce the law as "hard-liners" [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://immref.com/2006/07/28/immigrant-rights-and-the-washington-posts-spin/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hazleton: Reuters has interesting definitions</title>
		<link>http://immref.com/2006/07/14/hazleton-reuters-has-interesting-definitions/</link>
		<comments>http://immref.com/2006/07/14/hazleton-reuters-has-interesting-definitions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ImmRef</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://immref.com/2006/07/14/hazleton-reuters-has-interesting-definitions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Reuters' Jon Hurdle offers "Rights groups sue Pennylvania town on immigrant law." The "rights groups" in question are, among others, the far-left, illegal immigration-supporting ACLU and PRLDEF.
	Let's take a look at the first paragraph:
	A Pennsylvania town that passed one of the toughest immigration laws in the United States this week overstepped its authority, said a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://immref.com/2006/07/14/hazleton-reuters-has-interesting-definitions/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Center for American Progress: "Deporting the Undocumented"</title>
		<link>http://immref.com/2006/01/27/center-for-american-progress-deporting-the-undocumented/</link>
		<comments>http://immref.com/2006/01/27/center-for-american-progress-deporting-the-undocumented/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 06:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ImmRef</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://immref.com/2006/01/27/center-for-american-progress-deporting-the-undocumented/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	On July 26, 2005 the Clinton-affiliated think tank Center for American Progress released a study entitled "Deporting the Undocumented: A Cost Assessment":
	[The study] provides the first-ever estimate of the costs of a policy designed to deport all undocumented persons currently in the United States and those who successfully crossed the border (approximately 10 million people). [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://immref.com/2006/01/27/center-for-american-progress-deporting-the-undocumented/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Splits on Immigration Reflect Voters' Ambivalence</title>
		<link>http://immref.com/2006/01/03/political-splits-on-immigration-reflect-voters-ambivalence/</link>
		<comments>http://immref.com/2006/01/03/political-splits-on-immigration-reflect-voters-ambivalence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ImmRef</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://immref.com/2006/01/03/political-splits-on-immigration-reflect-voters-ambivalence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	The Washington Post's Dan Balz offers a superficial analysis of the issues here. It seems to be discussing the WaPo/ABC News December 2005 poll in this PDF file, but some of the questions he talks about aren't in that document. When I find the full poll I'll post more information, but for now consider this:
	The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://immref.com/2006/01/03/political-splits-on-immigration-reflect-voters-ambivalence/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
